Singing and Desire are Fruitful if they are linked
with the Divine (Gaan ane Moh Prabhu Sambandhi Hoy Tau falroop che):
Ek vaar koiye kahyu ke Maharaj Gaan neech ke Moh Neech. aa vastuoma koi dosh che? Tyare Aapshriye kahyu ke amrutnu paan to beumathi thay maate kariye, nakamu hoi te feki daiye. Saari vastu to game tyathi lai levi joiye.
Once someone asked, Maharaj is Singing lowly or Desire lowly, is there any fault in either of them ? Then aapshri said, one can drink/extract nectar from both of them therefore we should, and throw away that which is useless. A good thing should be taken from anywhere.
Vivechan:
Gaan ane Moh E vastuona tartamyama Shri Gokulesh kahe che ke, beuma sthan ane shrotani yogyata pramane tartamya che. Prabhu sambandhi Gaan ane Moh uttam che, mate te to amrut che, pan laukik vishayna Gaan ane Moh neech che maate te tyajya che.
The object of Singing and of Desire are compared by Shri Gokulesh, both have their right place according to the place and (the type/caliber of) listener. Both are of the highest classification if they are related to Prabhu, therefore they are nectar, however, materialistic singing and desire are of the lowest classification therefore they should be discarded (they are worthy of being discarded).
Vali/vadi Shri Gokulesh kahe che ke ukardama pan ratna padyu hoi to te grahan karvama vandho nathi. Tem bhagvad gnan game te rite paame tyathi sampadan karvama vandho nathi. Daivi cheej faave tyathi upyogma levay, matra te uttam etle daivi hovi joiye.
Again Shri Gokulesh says that there is no harm in taking a gem even if it is lying in a pile of rubbish. In the same way divine knowledge can be obtained anyhow, a divine object can be put to use from anywhere, only it should be of top quaity, means it should be divine.
Ek vaar koiye kahyu ke Maharaj Gaan neech ke Moh Neech. aa vastuoma koi dosh che? Tyare Aapshriye kahyu ke amrutnu paan to beumathi thay maate kariye, nakamu hoi te feki daiye. Saari vastu to game tyathi lai levi joiye.
Once someone asked, Maharaj is Singing lowly or Desire lowly, is there any fault in either of them ? Then aapshri said, one can drink/extract nectar from both of them therefore we should, and throw away that which is useless. A good thing should be taken from anywhere.
Vivechan:
Gaan ane Moh E vastuona tartamyama Shri Gokulesh kahe che ke, beuma sthan ane shrotani yogyata pramane tartamya che. Prabhu sambandhi Gaan ane Moh uttam che, mate te to amrut che, pan laukik vishayna Gaan ane Moh neech che maate te tyajya che.
The object of Singing and of Desire are compared by Shri Gokulesh, both have their right place according to the place and (the type/caliber of) listener. Both are of the highest classification if they are related to Prabhu, therefore they are nectar, however, materialistic singing and desire are of the lowest classification therefore they should be discarded (they are worthy of being discarded).
Vali/vadi Shri Gokulesh kahe che ke ukardama pan ratna padyu hoi to te grahan karvama vandho nathi. Tem bhagvad gnan game te rite paame tyathi sampadan karvama vandho nathi. Daivi cheej faave tyathi upyogma levay, matra te uttam etle daivi hovi joiye.
Again Shri Gokulesh says that there is no harm in taking a gem even if it is lying in a pile of rubbish. In the same way divine knowledge can be obtained anyhow, a divine object can be put to use from anywhere, only it should be of top quaity, means it should be divine.
No comments:
Post a Comment